One Hyena, Two Hyena. Big Hyena, Blue Hyena.
What do you wanna know?
Archive
Posted on 24th Jul at 9:19 AM, with 10,406 notes

goat-soap:

repeating opossum and rose pattern! Feel free to use with credit! If you want it on real things and not just your blog check out my shop!!

Wow, I really want this as a bandanna. :3

Posted on 23rd Jul at 8:17 PM, with 346 notes
ramblingferret:

nichotep:

samael:

phealgud:

thebritishdeer:

whitetail-music:

thebritishdeer:

whitetail-music:

thebritishdeer:

whitetail-music:

Meet the next Republican candidate for Presidency of the United States

"I WILL USE THE KRAGLE TO GLUE FAMILIES TOGETHER"

"What’s with all these DEMOCRATS touching MY STUFF??!?!?"

"RAINBOWS? CREATIVE IDEAS? NOT IN MY AMERICA"

We all know who the Democrat Nominee is

Hillary Kitten



I find it hilarious that, in seriousness the actual comparisons are backwards to the reality. Does anyone remember that conservatism is much closer to the unikitty anarchy of the political spectrumas compared to how close liberalism is to the “one small group of people controlling both the government and the business with a plastic fist ” like present business.I normally don’t comment but in this case the comparisons are literally backwards from the truth.

President Business is a an anti-immigrant, corporatist fascist who wants everything to remain the same forever and fears that the ousider will destroy the harmony he’s worked so hard to create, fueled by the oil industry (Octan - which used to be be actually Shell in terms of Lego products) and employs a police state and embraces a philosophy of “the nail that stands up will be pounded down”. President Business isn’t a ‘small group of people controlling both government and business’ - he is literally business. He is literally a stereotype of a slash and burn CEO to whom “nothing is personal, its just business”.
Unikitty’s beliefs are inherently anarchic and inconsistent. There are no rules except there are rules and they are such. There is no government except there is a Princess. There are a council of disparate and different people running a council, from all corners of society. One of the heroes is both physically challenged and black, one of them (Unikitty herself) has mental health issues and witnesses as big business destroys her culture, two of the group of heroes are female - one of whom is overtly feminine, the other is a driven, politically active punk. The hero portrayed as the most self-oriented (Batman) is also rich. If we’re going to talk about how conservative they are, lets remember that Metalbeard is a wounded veteran and how much American conservatives look after those guys.
Conservatism is opposed to change. It is unconcerned with social issues. It is pro-big business. It considers the outsider a threat to social harmony. Lord Business doesn’t represent government controlling business but the other way around - business controlling government. Business treats people as a means to an end - profit - not an end in and of themselves. The heroes of the movie are from every walk of life and are trying to bring about social change and the freedom of people to mix and innovate to their hearts content.
But hey, if that means some kind of libertarian dream to you (which, looking at Rand, is impossible - as your freewheeling objectivist hero needs people below them who are essentially out of the loop to profit off of - they just want nobody above them) then go nuts. I’m sure there’s free room to interpret Unikitty as John Galt and the master builders as being the ‘enlightened individuals’ that Rand rambled about - though that precludes Emmett from becoming one because there’s the note in her philosophy that you don’t just ‘become’ one of these people, sheep are always sheep. If anything, it shows that these ‘enlightened individuals’ can’t make something useful together - they have to work together instead of pursuing their own personal interests to be able to overcome the threats they face. Hardly “every man for himself” libertarianism. In the end, people are free to do as they please so long as they don’t hurt others - this is liberally minded, not libertarian. Libertarianism stops before the “so long as”. The rule of law, to quote Hammurabi on this, is to ensure that “the strong shall not harm the weak”.
I don’t want to dip into the logical fallacy of going “Oh its just a toy” or something but the movie wasn’t that hard to read. Thanks to Rand, the right seems to be able to claim any creative and inspired individual for their own political motivations - one would assume a similar reading of The Muppet movie from a few years ago, if you squint really hard, could be cast as being similar “randian enlightened individuals” in a metaphorical battle with “the obstructive and greedy state symbolized by Tex Richman” when, in actuality, its about a mishmash of people trying to get something from someone who is both rich and selfish. These are simple stories of an underdog unfairly treated by someone with all the power and as nations fail it is not the government who holds all the power but unfortunately corporations. As such, they make easy (and dare I say it appropriate because holy shit united fruit company, the business conspiracy, bhopal and many other instances where corporations fuck up the world and then divorce themselves of responsibility) bad guys.
Normally, I don’t get deeply into political discussions but some things get under my skin. I’ve had just enough crazy on this score from my brother, proclaiming that “the nazis were left wing” and “immigrants just won’t mix in!”. Y’all can’t complain about multiculturalism and then say “this villain who represents big business and hates multiculturalism is totally the left!”

Phealgud phaelsbahd.

Samael WIns. FLAWLESS VICTORY.

Even on a superficial level, Phealgud’s arguement is basically unfoundable.How could a dude who’s pro-big business, anti-immigration, and LITERALLY WANTS EVERYTHING TO REMAIN EXACTLY THE SAME AFTER HE’S GOT IT HOW HE LIKES IT, LITERALLY FREEZING EVERYTHING IN PLACE AS IT IS, AND REJECTING ANY ATTEMPT AT PROGRESSING BEYOND THATBe anything but conservative? Under any definition of conservatism?And the only way, the only way that Unikitty could be considered conservative is in the context of her own society - she likes her land the way it is, and wouldn’t want it to significantly change. Except when she does. So she’s not really conservative at all. She doesn’t have any political views beyond “Anarchy”. Emmet is conservative, but his excessive conservatism is considered a character flaw. He then learns to let loose from his conservative views and embrace new ideas that the rest of the party don’t come up with.I really want to know the thought process that lead to him saying that. Is it as simple as “I like Unikitty! She should think like me!”, or is there something more complex and sinister going on?
View high resolution

ramblingferret:

nichotep:

samael:

phealgud:

thebritishdeer:

whitetail-music:

thebritishdeer:

whitetail-music:

thebritishdeer:

whitetail-music:

Meet the next Republican candidate for Presidency of the United States

"I WILL USE THE KRAGLE TO GLUE FAMILIES TOGETHER"

"What’s with all these DEMOCRATS touching MY STUFF??!?!?"

"RAINBOWS? CREATIVE IDEAS? NOT IN MY AMERICA"

We all know who the Democrat Nominee is

image

Hillary Kitten

image

I find it hilarious that, in seriousness the actual comparisons are backwards to the reality. Does anyone remember that conservatism is much closer to the unikitty anarchy of the political spectrumas compared to how close liberalism is to the “one small group of people controlling both the government and the business with a plastic fist ” like present business.
I normally don’t comment but in this case the comparisons are literally backwards from the truth.

President Business is a an anti-immigrant, corporatist fascist who wants everything to remain the same forever and fears that the ousider will destroy the harmony he’s worked so hard to create, fueled by the oil industry (Octan - which used to be be actually Shell in terms of Lego products) and employs a police state and embraces a philosophy of “the nail that stands up will be pounded down”. President Business isn’t a ‘small group of people controlling both government and business’ - he is literally business. He is literally a stereotype of a slash and burn CEO to whom “nothing is personal, its just business”.

Unikitty’s beliefs are inherently anarchic and inconsistent. There are no rules except there are rules and they are such. There is no government except there is a Princess. There are a council of disparate and different people running a council, from all corners of society. One of the heroes is both physically challenged and black, one of them (Unikitty herself) has mental health issues and witnesses as big business destroys her culture, two of the group of heroes are female - one of whom is overtly feminine, the other is a driven, politically active punk. The hero portrayed as the most self-oriented (Batman) is also rich. If we’re going to talk about how conservative they are, lets remember that Metalbeard is a wounded veteran and how much American conservatives look after those guys.

Conservatism is opposed to change. It is unconcerned with social issues. It is pro-big businessIt considers the outsider a threat to social harmony. Lord Business doesn’t represent government controlling business but the other way around - business controlling government. Business treats people as a means to an end - profit - not an end in and of themselves. The heroes of the movie are from every walk of life and are trying to bring about social change and the freedom of people to mix and innovate to their hearts content.

But hey, if that means some kind of libertarian dream to you (which, looking at Rand, is impossible - as your freewheeling objectivist hero needs people below them who are essentially out of the loop to profit off of - they just want nobody above them) then go nuts. I’m sure there’s free room to interpret Unikitty as John Galt and the master builders as being the ‘enlightened individuals’ that Rand rambled about - though that precludes Emmett from becoming one because there’s the note in her philosophy that you don’t just ‘become’ one of these people, sheep are always sheep. If anything, it shows that these ‘enlightened individuals’ can’t make something useful together - they have to work together instead of pursuing their own personal interests to be able to overcome the threats they face. Hardly “every man for himself” libertarianism. In the end, people are free to do as they please so long as they don’t hurt others - this is liberally minded, not libertarian. Libertarianism stops before the “so long as”. The rule of law, to quote Hammurabi on this, is to ensure that “the strong shall not harm the weak”.

I don’t want to dip into the logical fallacy of going “Oh its just a toy” or something but the movie wasn’t that hard to read. Thanks to Rand, the right seems to be able to claim any creative and inspired individual for their own political motivations - one would assume a similar reading of The Muppet movie from a few years ago, if you squint really hard, could be cast as being similar “randian enlightened individuals” in a metaphorical battle with “the obstructive and greedy state symbolized by Tex Richman” when, in actuality, its about a mishmash of people trying to get something from someone who is both rich and selfish. These are simple stories of an underdog unfairly treated by someone with all the power and as nations fail it is not the government who holds all the power but unfortunately corporations. As such, they make easy (and dare I say it appropriate because holy shit united fruit company, the business conspiracy, bhopal and many other instances where corporations fuck up the world and then divorce themselves of responsibility) bad guys.

Normally, I don’t get deeply into political discussions but some things get under my skin. I’ve had just enough crazy on this score from my brother, proclaiming that “the nazis were left wing” and “immigrants just won’t mix in!”. Y’all can’t complain about multiculturalism and then say “this villain who represents big business and hates multiculturalism is totally the left!”

Phealgud phaelsbahd.

Samael WIns. FLAWLESS VICTORY.

Even on a superficial level, Phealgud’s arguement is basically unfoundable.

How could a dude who’s pro-big business, anti-immigration, and

LITERALLY WANTS EVERYTHING TO REMAIN EXACTLY THE SAME AFTER HE’S GOT IT HOW HE LIKES IT, LITERALLY FREEZING EVERYTHING IN PLACE AS IT IS, AND REJECTING ANY ATTEMPT AT PROGRESSING BEYOND THAT

Be anything but conservative? Under any definition of conservatism?

And the only way, the only way that Unikitty could be considered conservative is in the context of her own society - she likes her land the way it is, and wouldn’t want it to significantly change. Except when she does. So she’s not really conservative at all. She doesn’t have any political views beyond “Anarchy”.

Emmet is conservative, but his excessive conservatism is considered a character flaw. He then learns to let loose from his conservative views and embrace new ideas that the rest of the party don’t come up with.

I really want to know the thought process that lead to him saying that. Is it as simple as “I like Unikitty! She should think like me!”, or is there something more complex and sinister going on?

Posted on 22nd Jul at 2:44 PM, with 169 notes

Let it GoAnimate!

Posted on 21st Jul at 5:17 PM, with 277 notes
dragondicks:

oldroots:

IT WORKS
I WAS WORRIED IT WOULDNT BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE BETTER CHARACTER CUSTOMIZATION MOD BUT IT IS

please tell me you make rattling noises as you walk

Hazel, you can play a Skeleman in Skyrim! Finally, an interesting race to play.
View high resolution

dragondicks:

oldroots:

IT WORKS

I WAS WORRIED IT WOULDNT BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE BETTER CHARACTER CUSTOMIZATION MOD BUT IT IS

please tell me you make rattling noises as you walk

Hazel, you can play a Skeleman in Skyrim! Finally, an interesting race to play.

Posted on 19th Jul at 3:10 PM, with 679 notes

oldroots:

image

i finally finished it

recruitable gnoll thief for the game. very cowardly and gross, but also very lucky

Did you say recruitable gnoll.

Posted on 15th Jul at 9:13 AM, with 24 notes
theblackgreywarden asked: I think Anuvia was talking more about the extremists. The people who think cats can be trans and whatnot

I’m sure you can verify that, seeker of truth.

Posted on 13th Jul at 11:59 PM, with 1,735 notes

ramblingferret:

rocketumbl:

Warren Thomas  Titanium / Carbon Fiber Katana

RULES OF NATURE~

Oh my fucking god, I designed a katana that looks just like this.

It was supposed to look cheap and manufactured with a kitchen knife handle.

And it’s real.

Posted on 13th Jul at 11:48 PM, with 91,178 notes

thisisthinprivilege:

gross—girl:

uneprincesseecriture:

thisisableism:

thisisableism:

janus-ra-and-eris:

thisisableism:

[Image Description: Series of “before and after’ shots. The before pictures consist of a thin person wearing plus sized clothing from thrift shops. The after pictures consist of the same person wearing the same clothing refashioned and cut down to their size.]

queenmerbabe:

benegesseritangel:

eee-in:

benegesseritangel:

rrrramsey:

tedkordisanasshole:

I found this great blog today and had to share it :D 

Refashionista is an amazing seamstress who refashions awful thrift-store finds into new clothes and some of these results are so amazing?? Check her out! :D

she is a goddess

So she’s taking plus sized clothing and making it into hipster wear for people who aren’t fat?  Ok. 

looks ten times better on her anyways  

that is besides the point. She’s taking resources from plus sized people who likely need it more than she does. If she was really any good at her refashioning, she could use clothing that was her size(or close to it) and make her hipster monstrosities that way. 

She’s not just taking plus sized clothing. She’s taking plus sized clothing for people who don’t have even have the option to buy into the monopolized world of plus size shops. I have friends who get 90% of their clothes from thrift stores. I get this is just one person, but fuck, you don’t need to be getting thrifted clothes that are more than twice your fucking size to repurpose them.

YOU ESPECIALLY DON’T NEED TO MAKE HUMILIATING CARICATURE-LIKE STANCES IN EVERY BEFORE PICTURE THAT MOCKS THE STANCE/POSTURING/AND SIMPLY THE SPACE FAT PEOPLE EXIST IN.

like how much do you have to hate fat people to do this.

I dunno i thought she did a great job

it’s not about whether she did a good job or not, she used plus sized clothes from a thrift shop to do this. It’s really hard to find plus sized clothes in the first place, and it’s even harder if you’re not wealthy. She’s taking away limited resources from people who actually need them. Plus in the before pictures she decided it would be cool to mock fat people by making weird caricature like stances as queenmerbabe said.

#tumblr hates creativity #tumblr hates people repurposing things nobody was using anyway #tumblr hates resisting the urge to shame people

glad to hear poor fat people count as “nobody” in your mind. and tumblr is not a monolith.

Really?! Like A+ for creativity lady, but why didn’t you just go to a fabric store to get the supplies to make your clothes? It is really hard to find affordable plus size clothing. You’re what, a size 4? Go shopping in one of the thousands of other stores tailor-made for women your size. thisisthinprivilege This is super irritating.

Ughhhhhh fuck this so hard. I am so proud of the PRETTY CLOTHES in my closet that have come from thrift stores because 90% of the time when I go, I don’t find anything all, or I have to do a bunch of repurposing on my own to be able to wear it. The thought of a thin person going and repurposing some of the few cute things we even have in thrift stores is disgusting. There are plenty of cute clothes in the straight size section. I know because despite all my best efforts to resist, I will often continue browsing into the straight size section hoping to find something really stretchy. The amount of times I’ve found myself lamenting a dress that didn’t come in size fat outnumber the number of cute clothes I’ve found about 10:1. Go repurpose those. Plus maybe can we stop talking about how talented she is? If she went to the fabric store and bought a plus size dress worth of fabric, no one would be gawking at how ~*amazing*~ her craftsmanship is. There’s not a lot going on with those dresses design-wise. They’re amazed that she was able to turn something as ugly and disgusting as *gasp* plus sized clothes into something that’s flattering for a thin person.

Finding cute plus size clothes is hard, doubly so if you’re poor (also remember that thing where there is a correlation between poverty and fatness??). Don’t take the few resources poor fat people have away from them. Fashion can do so much for your self-esteem and mental health. I can’t stress enough how totally fucked up this is. Fuck you and the thin privilege you rode in on.

You know what would be a way better show of craftsmanship? Finding plus-sized clothes, and re purposing them without changing their size. Or finding straight sized clothes and re purposing them into plus sized clothes. Make something absolutely fabulous that plus-sized people can wear, rather than yet more fashion for thin people.

Though, I don’t think much of her repurposing, anyway, it seems to be “cut off everything into a little black dress pattern, dye it and add a belt”. There is almost nothing of the original design remaining in some cases, and in others, she literally just cut off the sleeves and most of the fabric. How is this talented? She just resized a dress to fit her and cut off the sleeves. The only reason it looks better on her after she “repurposed” it is because she doesn’t fit the original dress. Adding a belt, and dyeing the fabric, and cutting off the sleeves will give the exact same style of dress for a plus-sized person.

Start
00:00 AM